“There May Be A Link between The Hep. B shot and Colic In Infants” as per my Twitter Feed One Day

5724298185_e174b7696c_z1

My son was born almost two months premature, suffered liver dysfunction needing bilirubin lights for a week, and didn’t suckle requiring he be fed through a nose tube for 6 weeks.  I was never asked if I wanted him to have a Vitamin K shot, antibiotics in his eyes, or a Hepatitis B shot.  They were administered without my knowledge.  Also, shortly after we brought him home from hospital, he screamed around the clock for the first 6 months of his life. No joke, 6 months around the clock.  It was a scream that I will never forget.  Imagine someone being murdered in their bed and you’ll perhaps conjure the force of his blood-curdling shrieks.

Although I knew it was not normal, I had no clue what to do about it.  I was once at a baby and me drop in on a Friday at the local community centre.  While I paced the halls trying to soothe my screeching baby, all the other moms had their wee infant lovelies on their laps singing, “The Wheels On The Bus Go Round and Round, Round and Round, Round and Round …”  I so wanted to be on the bus, just alone, to bawl my eyes out all through the town.

My life was in shambles from several months of being woken hourly around the clock.  When I did try to sleep, my autonomic nervous system had become so fried, that I’d lost the capacity to shut it down to effectively let go to sleep.  By month 4, as soon as I drifted off, I would tunnel back up to the surface in gasping fits like a post-war Vietnam vet still living on the front lines.  I was clearly suffering Colic-Post-Traumatic-Stress-Disorder (C-PTSD).  In those first six months of hell on earth, we nicknamed our infant son, “Le Miserable.”

Also, he could keep little food down, seemingly hating my breast milk.  He suffered spewing reflux coating the walls and myself in sour breast milk day after day, hour after hour.  Every week, I was counselled by family and visiting nurses (Yes, they sent nurses over to ensure I’d not completely lost my mind) to go off yet another food so that my son would not be sensitive to my milk.   If another person cited, “It must be the fruits you’re eating,” or “It must be the vegetables you’re eating.” By the end of month 4, I was eating nothing but bread, apple sauce and water.  I felt like I was dying inside.  I hated my life.  There was nothing about being a new mother that I felt I could appreciate. Nothing!

With the delayed MMR shot, at 15 months, my son lost all speech, eye contact and started to rock back and forth for minutes or hours at a time.  In my later research, I’d come to find out he was vaccine-damaged, however, I’d never equated the first 6 months of insufferable colic, off the charts of any state of normalcy, with anything other than his prematurity and my seemingly poisonous milk until I saw a fateful line in my twitter stream one day a few months ago, “There May Be A Link between The Hep. B shot and Colic In Infants!”

My head rolled around on its axis and a new kind of anger and resentment took a hold of my gut, roiled around a couple of gnarly turns in my loins and then switched on about twenty little 20 year old light bulbs in my mind.  All that shame and guilt that I’d felt for resorting to gripe water started to be illuminated, gathered up and loaded onto a sea of bitterness and spite … Part 2; The Sequel!

Are you kidding me?  The Hep. B shot could account for his liver issues when I couldn’t pick him up for almost 2 weeks while he was under the Bilirubin lights, his latch so weak that I pumped milk for him remotely for 8 weeks while he lived in the special care nursery in the hospital, all the reflux and inhuman screeching and sleepless nights could be at least partially anchored to the Thimerosal (mercury) laced vaccine for a sexually transmitted disease that my premature infant could never possibly come in contact with in the first place?  Also, there is not a shred of science proving its efficacy in that the vaccine can wear off even before my son became sexually active anyway?  Please excuse my language but WTF?!

I’ve sat on this for months, now.  Frankly, I’ve just been too gobsmacked to face it.  How might I react?  How did I want to deal with this new plot twist in our history?  For crying out loud (literally), I’d already written a book about my son’s vaccine damage and I’d not had this piece illuminated in time to even include this new piece of knowledge?  How am I going to get up on the roof tops once more to decry the damage done to my babe and let other parents know?  At 51,  with my son fully grown and now healthy, due to Heilkunst Medicine,  do I even have it in me to mount this fight for the truth to be illuminated.  You bet I do!

Allyson’s complete story is told in her first book The Path To Cure : The Whole Art of Healing Autism, and now you can listen to the audiobook version for free at this website.

Sources:

http://www.ageofautism.com/2009/10/birth-dose-hepatitis-b-vaccine-study.html

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/01/22/a-mothers-struggle-your-child-is-vaccine-injured-just-like-mine/

http://drlwilson.com/Articles/VACCINE%20HORROR.htm

http://www.naturodoc.com/library/bio-war/HepB.htm

http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/2013/03/11/7457/

Why Didn’t my Doctor Tell Me Chemo Kills?

“Originally written by F. William Engdahl. First appeared: http://journal-neo.org/2015/06/03/why-didn-t-my-doctor-tell-me-chemo-kills/

Permission to reproduce this article by New Eastern Outlook.”

In my daily research I came across a report so alarming I put aside planned writing in order to bring this to the attention of those who care about life. It has to do with one of the main treatments for cancer used in modern medicine—chemotherapy. New research has documented that chemotherapy, far from ridding anyone of cancer actually feeds the growth and spread of cancer.

Sometimes it almost seems like the drugs industry works overtime to find new ways to hurt, cripple or even kill us. Scientist Peter Nelson of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle in a write-up of a study of why cancer cells were so easy to kill in the lab but not inside our bodies, found that healthy cells damaged by chemotherapy secreted more of a protein called WNT16B which boosts cancer cell survival. “The increase in WNT16B was completely unexpected,” Nelson told AFP.

He added that,“WNT16B, when secreted, would interact with nearby tumor cells and cause them to grow, invade, and importantly, resist subsequent therapy.” That would explain why in cancer treatment, tumors often respond well initially, followed by rapid regrowth and then resistance to further chemotherapy.

The study was conducted by a team of scientists from different cancer research centers, universities as well as from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories. It was published online in August 2012 in the journal Nature Medicine. Among their alarming conclusions was that, “The expression of WNT16B in the prostate tumor microenvironment attenuated the effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy in vivo, promoting tumor cell survival and disease progression.”

Mustard Gas Toxin

While their study results were alarming enough, more alarming is the complete absence of aggressive action to reexamine the entire field of cancer treatment. Chemo’s origins go back to World War I research into the human effects of exposure to mustard gas. Scientists discovered that the gas was a potent suppressor of blood cell production. During World War II researchers at Yale University School of Medicine in further study of nitrogen mustards, reasoned that an agent that damaged the rapidly growing white blood cells might have a similar effect on cancer. Left out was how to target only cancer cells and not healthy cells. In December 1942, the scientists gave several patients with advanced lymphomas (cancers of the lymphatic system and lymph nodes), a chemotherapeutic drug intravenously. Their improvement was called remarkable. The media concentrated on the remarkable improvement and did not bother to note that soon after treatment all were dead.

The chemotherapy revolution in cancer treatment was off and running. In the 1950’s the first chemo drug used commercially was mustine or Chlormethine. Mustine under the code-name HN2 is a chemical warfare agent. Adverse effect include: “Hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis…Nausea, vomiting and depression of formed elements in the circulating blood…Jaundice, alopecia, vertigo, tinnitus and diminished hearing.”

The research and development of mustine as a possible anti-cancer chemotherapy was led by Cornelius P. Rhoads, director of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, in wartime secrecy and published in 1946 after the war. Rhoads came to Memorial Sloan-Kettering from the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research.

There during the 1930’s as part of the Rockefeller family’s obsession with eugenics, Rhoads spent six months in Puerto Rico, a stateless island often used covertly for human experimentation with new drugs.

In Puerto Rico in 1931Rhoads wrote a letter to a friend in Boston where he stated, “Porto (sic) Ricans are beyond doubt the dirtiest, laziest, most degenerate and thievish race of men ever inhabiting this sphere. What the island needs is not public health work but a tidal wave or something to totally exterminate the population. I have done my best to further the process of extermination by killing off eight and transplanting cancer into several more.”

Rockefeller family spin doctor, Ivy Lee, launched a major damage control campaign over the scandal and managed to get Rhoads on the cover of Time as a “life-saving” hero.

Deadly consequences

The subsequent use of toxic chemotherapies on perhaps millions of cancer patients since then have hardly been encouraging. Published side effects of today’s chemo drugs, the largest share of which are made by Roche, are horrendous. They include “depression of the immune system, often by paralysing the bone marrow and leading to a decrease of white blood cells, red blood cells, and platelets. Anemia and thrombocytopenia… sepsis, or as localized outbreaks, such as Herpes simplex, shingles, or other members of the Herpesviridea.”

It gets worse. Because of the chemo resulting in immune system suppression, patients often get typhlitis, a life-threatening gastrointestinal complication of chemotherapy. Typhlitis is an intestinal infection which may manifest itself through symptoms including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, a distended abdomen, fever, chills, or abdominal pain and tenderness. Typhlitis is a medical emergency. It has a very poor prognosis and is often fatal.  It can cause infertility failure in men and ovarian failure in women. All that in addition to the well-known hair-loss, dry skin, damaged fingernails, a dry mouth (xerostomia), water retention, and sexual impotence.

In 2004 the Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Australia, conducted a long-term investigation into the contribution of chemotherapy to 5-year survival in 22 major adult malignancies. The results were shocking: The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA. The study came to the following conclusion: “..it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival. To justify the continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy, a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life is urgently required.”

Chemo is massively toxic and kill any rapidly dividing cell, tumor or normal. The three best-selling cancer drugs worldwide in 2013 were all made by Roche—Rituxan, Herceptin and Avastin. For all three top chemo drugs sales totaled more than $21 billion.

And the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center now documents how chemotherapy drugs act as carcinogens—they cause cancer which is why, depending on the patient’s immune strength and dosage, within five years a staggering number die after the chemo that was to have saved them.

I was in Beijing several years ago on a speaking tour and had severe back pain after the long flight. My Chinese publisher organized a treatment from a doctor trained in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). She was also the grand-daughter of the chief TCM doctor of the Last Emperor who she said was still alive and chipper at 93 and passing his wisdom on to her and her brother. She told me at the Beijing medical university where she studied, the students were told, “One third of patients die of the psychological shock of being told by a doctor that they have cancer. Another third die from the negative effects of chemotherapy and radiation. The last third simply die.”

It would be useful for all doctors in active practice perhaps to rethink the principal ethical mandate of all physicians since the time of Hippocrates– “nil nocere” – do no harm. The evidence is overwhelming now that chemotherapy only does harm. Would the oncologists promoting chemo to their patients ever take the same were the roles reversed?

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.
First appeared: http://journal-neo.org/2015/06/03/why-didn-t-my-doctor-tell-me-chemo-kills/